Twitter: 'Pointless babble' is the whole point
I had to laugh when I read Pear Analytics' new research into Twitter. The shock exclusive – hot on the heels of revelations that the Pope is still Catholic and that bears like to evacuate their bowels in the woods – is that over 40% of tweets are pointless babble.
As you recover from that, I'm going to sock it to you with the other jaw-dropping findings.
- 37% of tweets are conversational
- Re-tweets (passing along someone else's tweet) make up 8.7% of the total
- 5.85% of tweets are self-promotional
- Spam and news account for about 3% of tweets each.
Or, to sum it up in a headline:
Social media discovered to be 'social' — researchers left reeling.
I'll come back to that in a minute. But the best bit about the whole business was the research report's apparent bemusement at some of the results.
A few examples:
- "we thought the news category would have more weight than dead last"
- "Self-promotion was also less than expected"
- "we thought that both spam and self-promotion percentages would be much higher".
I didn't, for two reasons. First of all, I actually use Twitter (this is me). Secondly, I have a rather unfashionable habit of relating what people do online to what they do in the real world.
It's an approach that's done best by Agatha Christie's Miss Marple. She has a tendency to unmask murderers because their behaviour reminds her of the grocer's boy, or the way the village solicitor's spinster sister used to deport herself in the queue for the post office. But the wider point is that, by observing people in one context (a small village), she can infer how people will behave in other situations (such as the aftermath of a murder).
It's quite a good discipline. Indeed, the Pear Analytics researchers would have done well to imagine Twitter as the village post office in St Mary Mead. If everyone was so much keener on news, self promotion and spam, the conversation would run something like this.
Postmistress: Hey you. Do you want a newspaper? Special offer, today only.
Vicar's wife: No. I want six. I simply devour current affairs.
Village idiot (bursting into shop): Buy my meds! Viagra, Cialis, best meds. Lolz. Byee!
Bank clerk: Ah postmistress. 12 copies of the Times please. Then I'll sell you a loan.
Village idiot (sticking head through window): Thanks for the follow! Are you interested in dramatically increasing your customers?!
Milkman: Did you hear the Bank Clerk? He said "12 copies of the Times please. Then I'll sell you a loan." Milk anyone?
Village idiot (standing at door with megaphone): More Customers = More Laughs = More Money = More Fun... You'll LOVE it.
Yes, there is a proportion of Twitter users that behave just like that. But the point to remember is that social media is used by a society of people. In other words, people just like you and me who talk inconsequential nonsense most of the time, enjoy chatting with other people, and once in a while feel the need to sell something or pass on the news.
That's why the average series of Twitter exchanges are rather like conversation in a real village post office (one of the still-open ones of course), but transplanted online. To reverse the fantasy:
@dapostmistrez Gd morningz peeps. How RU all?
@revsmissus Oh noes. My feets is killing me, oh dears. And I has no breakfasts.
@bankcounterman Hey @dapostmistrez. Have you any bunion lotion for @revsmissus?
@waynethemilkman Grt idea @bankcounterman. I think @revmissus cd do with an extra pt of milk! I'm so tired too!
@revsmissus Thx all. @dapostmistress Can I has lotion and milk plz. And some stampz. And a newzpapa.
@smmvillageidiot Meds, Cailis, Vaigra. Keep going all night. LOLZ!!!!!!!!!
In other words, people indulge in pointless babble about their meals, their ailments, their state of mind and all the rest because they enjoy it, and it's part of the social lubricant — both online and off. People like talking rubbish to each other, and getting to know other people by exchanging nonsense is a necessary part of buying and selling.
That's what social media is all about. Including the fact that some people, like spammers and tedious self-promoters, just don't 'get it'.
Anyway, now you've got to know me, can I interest you in @coastdigital's excellent digital direct marketing services? Or maybe the website usability guide? After all, they're things that friends should see...
Twitter leads as social networks enter the search game
Twitter recently announced that it has changed its title tags for profiles, making a big impact on how high these pages are ranked in search engines.
The news can be either good or bad, depending on who you are! For those who want visibility, it will be a blessing. Others are going to have to adapt.
If you tweet for informational purposes then the changes couldn’t be better. But if you tweet about your mother-in-law’s annoying habits or why your colleagues could give David Brent a run for their money, then you’d better wise up to increased search engine exposure.
Let’s take a look at the changes, using the US President as an example. I used the Wayback Machine to view his profile, as it appeared in 2007. Take a look at the title tag in my browser.
2007 Format: Twitter / Username
![]()
In contrast, today’s format looks like this: Full name (username) on Twitter
![]()
Small change – big results!
So, what can you expect when you search for someone’s personal name?
If they have an online presence, you would usually see their profiles on social networking sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn and My Space amid Google’s first two results pages. With the recent changes, however, you’re likely to see a person’s Twitter page rank highest of all.

It makes me wonder what Twitter will do next, as I’m certain we will see a few more changes made to benefit search.
Interestingly Google has also undertaken a Pagerank update that has slashed the ranking of many Twitter pages. Twitter itself has risen from rank 8 to 9, but most profiles have dropped – from 8 to 6, from 7 to 4 and so on.
Staying on the same topic, Facebook announced yesterday that it is also changing its link structure. The site plans to use the usernames as the URL extension instead of the current, randomly assigned number.
For example:

![]()
Facebook has posted:
We're planning to offer Facebook usernames to make it easier for people to find and connect with you. When your friends, family members or co-workers visit your profile or Pages on Facebook, they will be able to enter your username as part of the URL in their browser. This way people will have an easy-to-remember way to find you. We expect to offer even more ways to use your Facebook username in the future.
Is this recognition that Twitter is one step ahead of the game, having already propelled ‘Tweeters’ to higher search rankings than MySpace and Facebook profiles?
Either way, it’s safe to say that the changes are going to have a big impact, just as the Twitter changes did. And from my point of view, it’s great that these social sites are finally becoming more search friendly.
The opinions expressed herein are the personal opinion of the author and are not intended as statements of fact and do not represent the view of Coastdigital Limited in any way


RSS Feed