marketing you can measure
Talk to us today020 7061 6426
You are here: Home > Blog > An affiliate network monopoly would spell bad news for the little guys

Blog

02
Mar 10

An affiliate network monopoly would spell bad news for the little guys

Robin Moore Photograph

Affiliate Window and Buy.at

I am going to lay my cards on the table early, but I’ve a gut feeling that AOL’s sale of affiliate marketing arm Buy.at to Digital Window, parent company of Affiliate Window, will end up being bad news for merchants.

Both Buy.at and Affiliate Window are already major players in UK and European affiliate marketing – and between them they represent more household names than any other affiliate network. Add Tradedoubler and DGM and you’ve almost got the UK affiliate market covered.

So, what are the ramifications of a major merger like this, and what does it mean to all involved? Let’s examine each interested group in turn.

Affiliates

The good news:

  • One less affiliate network to deal with
  • Fewer duplicate marketing emails from affiliate programmes that run through two or more networks.

And the bad:

  • No room to negotiate with a network - you can’t threaten to join the same programme on another network.

Merchants / advertisers

Positives:

  • Whole industries of advertisers could be represented by a single network
  • The rigmarole of cross-network de-duping sales goes away.

Negatives:

  • Whole industries of advertisers could be represented by a single network (!)
  • Less competition, and worse deals on price
  • Deterioration of service – the network would have no major competitors trying to steal its clients.

The networks

It’s almost entirely good news for the networks involved:

  • Major benefits of scale
  • Servicing more clients with fewer staff and one set of business systems
  • Higher returns from larger clients – the networks earn a fee based on the function of their total affiliate commission (usually a negotiable 30% override) so the potential to earn from one high street name is larger than the potential from servicing hundreds of small programmes.

Unless, of course, you are an unlucky network employee:

  • Redundancies in the network workplace.

Agencies

Things are equally bright from the agency point of view:

  • One less network supplier to deal with
  • Familiarity with the new, big network player
  • Billing and reporting consolidated.

Although one of these positives is also a potential pitfall:

  • One less network to compare.

As you can see, a mixed bag.

It’s early days yet, but I’m worried that many in the industry have been premature in giving the merger a big thumbs up. Maybe it’s my British tendency to back the little guy, but I can see a combined Buy.at and Affiliate Window having a near monopoly in certain market verticals – a good example is broadband.

Whilst this is good for me as a part-time affiliate – I’ll be able to login to one network’s system and see all the important criteria gathered in one place – I can’t help worry about the merchants.

If you’re a merchant, there are clear benefits of being on the same networks as your competitors (access to the same affiliates), but in a monopoly situation you will have real difficulties negotiating down network fees.

Similarly, in the agency world, prospective clients often ask about conflict of interest – and will say that an agency can’t best service its interests when it represents every other company in the same market.

And while the merger is great for the networks, it isn’t for the companies they represent. In my opinion, not all merchants will be best served by the merger, and should be entitled to end their contract prematurely.

Do you agree?

(Note: I'd like to emphasise that these are very much my personal opinions, and not those of Coast Digital)

About the author

As our head of consultancy and client services, Robin helps Coast Digital clients develop and grow their business through expert consultancy, research and marketing advice and guidance.

Since joining the team in November 2006, he’s worked with many of Coast Digital’s clients. Current projects include consultancy for Wiltshire Farm Foods, Slendertone, Swatch, Office Shoes, Marketing File and Freedom Marketing.

Though Robin’s day-to-day focus is on digital marketing he likes to keep up-to-date with trends in web development. His current interest is the power of blogs to achieve uplift in search engine results.

Comments

Posted By Matt | 03 Mar 2010 09:19:26
Maybe this is a good thing, my experience of affiliate networks has not been a good one, they cost me dearly in mistakes, maybe now they will start to get it right.

Would be good to see affiliate software companies allowing merchants to take programs in-house as these networks are expensive to say the least!
Posted By hisnibs | 03 Mar 2010 09:49:00
Personally – I think this is a case of Awin using the takeover as a launching pad to get into the US. Buy.at already has begun establishing themselves state-side, with their Ticketmaster affiliate programme in particular proving very successful and creating waves in the US market. The tools are there, as is the talent at buy.at and it makes sense to piggy-back on that when AOL are desperate to sell any part of the company that they can make money from (buy.at being one of the few parts of the ‘Platform-A’ experiment that was turning a profit).

I think it was a mutually beneficial deal for both AOL (financially) and DW (strategically), with buy.at just going along for the ride.
Posted By Ashley Fletcher | 02 Mar 2010 05:26:18
Hey Robin - nice post. I think the move will help regulate the industry, less little pockets of poor affiliate networks means more quality in the market as a whole. I've never been a fan of buy.at really, Awin have always offered good tools & communication to help affiliates.

It is getting closer to a monopoly, but not quite in the same league as the current search engine monopoly going on.
Posted By kcheung | 02 Mar 2010 05:15:15
mixed blessings even from an agency point of view, we never have exclusives and always strive to use more than one network, with this merger only the big blue chip clients will really benefit, smaller clients may end up paying through the nose for this. also, i've been sitting at my desk wondering who to replace buy.at with in terms of second networks...webgains, good tech and support but not enough volume...bit of a catch22 really.
Posted By Robin | 02 Mar 2010 04:50:15
Hi guys. Thanks for the comments. I thought twice about writing the post but thought it would give a balance to all the positive spin behind this merger. It probably is a great deal but when something is GREAT I try to find the weaknesses.

Matt - You are absolutely right; DGM are not that big any more - I mentioned them because I have noticed some of their clients moving to Buy.at (adds to the drama). I have also noticed Tradedoubler losing out once merchants decide to de-dupe their cost base and go with one network - normally Buy.at but increasingly AWin.

Tony - I caught news of the 51% Zanox stake too. I don't know too much about them other than we tried launching a UK campaign with them, the end client/merchant let us down, so we went no further.

Hey Carl - I love the buy.at interface! - nice and simple. My (or the Buy.at system's) inability to report by affiliate website is shocking! But I, like you, like to go to one place to grab my links and track my performance. I can't see Tradedoubler getting sold any time soon (rushes to buy shares).

Shaun - Things do move quickly online so I won't make any predictions only recommendations to merchants of Buy.at / AWin....

1. Check what this deal means in your industry sector - who is going to be in the combined pool of merchants?
2. Check with AWin what they intend to do about your contract.
Post a Comment
Post a comment

  

Please solve the simple maths question ( 9+8 )