marketing you can measure
Talk to us today020 7061 6426
You are here: Home > Blog > Google's Realtime Search - What does it really mean for AdWords Advertisers?

Blog

07
Sep 10

Google's Realtime Search - What does it really mean for AdWords Advertisers?

Michael Carden-Edwards Photograph

Doing a quick search on Google this morning lead me to realise that at some point since yesterday, Google had enabled Realtime Search on my account. Upon experimenting with the new feature, it raised a few questions for me in relation to PPC.

Let me explain; As an example, If I were to search for “Cheap Car Insurance For Women” Google appears to run a search on each of these steps, including the initial phrase “cheap”.

Thomas Cook are currently bidding on that very generic term - this would be a reasonable term to display results against, if I was actually searching for “cheap holiday” phrases - it would be the first advert I see and I may very well click on it.


As I have discussed, this was not my intention at all, I actually want to search for a far more specific longer tail search term. As I carry on with “Cheap Car Insurance” it would seem that GoCompare have had an impression against their ad which I have no intention of clicking on.



I finally finish typing my search and have seen Aviva at the top of the paid search results.



The real questions that this raises for me are:

  • Has Google attributed a search to the terms I was in the middle of searching for? (“Cheap” for example)
  • Have the adverts shown had an impression attributed to them?
  • If so, then this will mean a massive drop in CTR for generic search terms?
  • How will Google combat this, or react?
  • Does this mean that longer-tail search terms will end up being even more competitive?

Throw your thoughts in the comment hat…

 

About the author

Michael is an Online Marketing Executive in Coast Digital’s Online Marketing team. His work combines SEO, PPC and he takes a keen interest in social networking trends.

He joined the team fresh out of University, where he completed a degree in Computer Science. He is currently working with various B2B and B2C clients in many diverse verticals.

Michael is extremely passionate about online marketing and is always keen to expand his knowledge and refine his skills in relation to web analytics and PPC account optimisation, as well as stay on top of all the latest practices and developments in the industry.
 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments

Posted By Dave Hatton | 04 Nov 2010 03:58:32
After a couple of months using instant now, I thought I would revisit this piece!

Michael, good point - the flip side of the coin i suppose. And yes i agree, i heard about the 3 second rule, and i've noticed if you watch and wait 3 seconds whilst using instant, you can see that google 'refreshes' to count the impression(s) on the ads showing.

I think my original post was a bit quick to assume - so far there has been no unusual behaviour for any of my clients at all and reporting is fine to treat as normal. Good stuff :)

@DaveHatton
Posted By Michael Carden-Edwards | 23 Sep 2010 09:30:30
I'm not sure I agree with your third paragraph at all Dave. More impressions that aren't seen will obviously have a knock-on effect to lowering CTR, and as we all know a low CTR can be detrimental to Quality Score meaning advertisers will have to up CPC to maintain higher positions.

It is mostly irrelevant anyway as Google announced that impressions are only counted if the ad is displayed for at least 3 seconds.


Posted By Joel Lumsden | 08 Sep 2010 05:46:35
Google have to clarify this pretty quickly otherwise they're gonna risk getting some flack! Unless there's a major change in the Quality Score algorithm I really can't see them counting the 'mid-search' ads as impressions. But then this is pretty much saying that any searches on a non-real-time from which something isn't clicked shouldn't count has impressions either. I do wonder how they're going to appease the advertisers...
Posted By Dave Hatton | 08 Sep 2010 09:30:15
I think this will change the way impressions are counted for sure. Perhaps even a new format of recording impressions completely, such as the overall impression count being able to be narrowed down detailing 'one term impressions', 'two term impressions' and so on...

I think Google certainly would not commit suicide by making a decision such as this without thinking of the advertising implications, therefore i reckon they have a plan and all will be made clear soon...

As far as i can tell, it can only be a good thing for advertisers, as surely this would increase the number of impressions of your ads and therefore potentially increase the number of clicks/conversions (with a knock on effect of increasing cost, for good reasons). I dont think generic terms will be affected, just more now than ever, all bases need to be covered when targeting keywords/terms.

@DaveHatton
Post a Comment
Post a comment

  

Sign me up!