
Yesterday Google launched a service called Sidewiki.
I'm a sucker for anything new, so before I'd read more than a couple of sentences on the topic, I was downloading the Google browser toolbar with Sidewiki integrated into it. The add-on toolbar is available for Firefox 2+ or Internet Explorer 6+ and it will soon become a feature of Google's own browser, Chrome (and, I hope, the nascent Chromium for Mac).
So what's the concept?
Essentially, Sidewiki is a system that allows you to comment on any web page. The idea, according to Google, is for readers to contribute "insights" and "helpful information" to any page. All you do is press the Sidewiki icon in your browser toolbar, and then you can leave your thoughts on any page. For example, one of my first actions was to give the team here at Coast some well-deserved praise. Visiting www.coastdigital.co.uk I typed in the following:

In an ideal world, the Sidewiki would be used for relevant, intelligent discussion of the page in question. But I have doubts that this will even be the norm. Visiting the Google UK home page, I found that the discussion so far didn't add anything to my experience.

Similarly, a spammer had got in on the act early over at econsultancy.

This is the question that is all important, and - I think - too early to answer. There are, as I write, no Sidewikis on the home pages of technology sites such as The Register or the Guardian's technology pages - and a paltry two Sidewiki comments on the blog of Google's Matt Cutts. Most of the stories I've so far read about Sidewikis don't have Sidewikis themselves (apart from the one I added to The Telegraph).
So, a day in, things are looking slow. Only if Sidewiki gets popular will its joys and flaws become properly apparent.
That said, there are pros and cons that you can already detect. The best thing I've seen so far is the facility for site owners to add a sticky post at the top of the Sidewiki. As long as your site is registered with Google Webmaster Tools, and you are logged into your Google account, you are recognised as the site owner - and your comment goes to the top. Great for adding another welcome or plug for your services.
I can also see that backlinks in Sidewiki have SEO potential, though I plan talk to some of the team here to see what they think. Will these links actually have much value? I just don't know.
On the other hand, my worries are these:
Of course, Sidewiki may well fizzle out in a week. Comments please, and preferably at the foot of this page...
Ben Locker is a freelance writer who has contributed to a wide range of publications, from The Times to local newspapers and magazines. He has been blogging in various corners of the Internet since 2003, and is as interested in the mechanics of the web as he is its content.
A magazine journalist and qualified teacher, he has spent much of his career working for education charities and other voluntary sector organisations. He became a freelance writer in early 2006 and now runs a popular copywriting agency.
Ben is particularly interested in the craftmanship of writing, and most enjoys helping others crystallise their ideas in the right words. His first book, a satire of which he was co-author, was published by Atlantic in 2007.
Comments
Either way, a bunch of folks seem to have posted to the front page of the sidewiki page, so problem solved for the day at least.
@ Justin Goldbeg - I think the problem with that would be to sanitise the service, where it was used.
@ Roz S - There are unexpected highlights to the story. Never any harm in seeing a newspaper with egg on its face!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html
"Why??
..would you read this sad toss? Don't you have more important things to do? Seriously.. you'll find better/proper news here: http://www.guardian.co.uk"
Webmasters should be allowed to opt out.